All 8 platforms
Head-to-head comparison
iRoofing vs EagleView
Two roofing platforms a contractor might evaluate side-by-side. Here's how they compare on time to roof report, included features, pricing, and customer-grounded pros and cons.
Ranked #7
iRoofing
4.4
Measure roofs, estimate materials, simulate projects, generate proposals — all from one app.
- Time to report
- 10 minutes
- Price per report
- $10
- Best for
- Small-to-mid residential roofing contractors (1–15 reps) whose primary need is fast on-site measurement and a polished in-home sales presentation, especially shops running the proposal in front of the homeowner on a tablet
Ranked #4
EagleView
4.3
The legacy aerial roof measurement standard, now reimagined as EagleView One 3D
- Time to report
- 3-6 hr (standard); up to 24-48 hr
- Price per report
- ~$80
- Best for
- Insurance-restoration and storm-chasing roofers who need ESX-exportable measurement reports with the broadest CRM integration footprint and hail/wind history data
The short version
iRoofing edges out EagleView.
On our 5-axis rubric, iRoofing scores 7.5 to EagleView's 5.5 — a 2.0-point gap. The biggest differentiator is time to roof report: iRoofing at 10 minutes versus EagleView at 3-6 hr (standard); up to 24-48 hr.
What's included.
Feature-by-feature: measurement, proposal, CRM, AI design, and financing — plus turnaround time and per-report price.
| Feature | iRoofing | EagleView |
|---|---|---|
Roof measurement Produces a measured roof report from satellite, aerial, or smartphone photos | ||
Proposal generation Turns the measurement into a polished, sendable customer proposal | ||
CRM / pipeline Tracks leads, jobs, and follow-ups through the sales process | ||
AI design generation Generates the design automatically, no manual sketching required | ||
Financing integrations Built-in lender integrations for in-home financing offers | ||
Time to roof report Pulled from vendor pricing pages | 10 minutes | 3-6 hr (standard); up to 24-48 hr |
Price per report | $10 | ~$80 |
The scores.
Same 5-axis rubric every platform is scored against. Public weights, no vendor input.
iRoofing · #7
7.5/ 10
Speed to Quote
7.6
Mobile UX
7.4
Pricing Transparency
8.4
Ease of Setup
7.4
Customer Support
6.6
EagleView · #4
5.5/ 10
Speed to Quote
5.0
Mobile UX
7.0
Pricing Transparency
3.0
Ease of Setup
7.0
Customer Support
6.0
What customers say.
iRoofing
Strengths
- Full roof takeoffs in under 10 minutes via the mobile app per recurring Capterra reviewer praise
- AI roof color visualizer lets reps show alternative shingle styles on the homeowner’s actual house — a closing tool
- Clearoof aircraft-captured aerial imagery covers ~90% of US areas and helps see through partial tree cover
- Pricing is published and bundle-simple ($149/mo all-in for 3 users) — no tier-laddering
Tradeoffs
- Tree-covered roofs break the sketch tool — even a single tree over the roof can make manual sketching impossible
- Tablet-first; phone and desktop versions are second-class and don’t sync, so a measurement on one device isn’t visible on others
- “Many features are buggy” and support is “fairly useless” per several Capterra reviews
EagleView
Strengths
- Industry-standard accuracy with ESX export — preferred by insurance adjusters and Xactimate workflows
- Broadest CRM integration footprint: AccuLynx, JobNimbus, Roofr, ServiceTitan, Leap, and most roofing platforms pull reports directly
- Hail and wind storm-event history reports are a real differentiator for insurance-restoration work
- Massive proprietary aerial imagery archive; coverage across virtually all U.S. residential addresses
Tradeoffs
- Sales-gated, opaque pricing — no public rate card; you must talk to a rep to learn what you'll actually pay
- Reported price increases through 2023-2024 pushed Premium reports from ~$60 toward ~$80-$87, drawing contractor complaints on Capterra and forums
- Turnaround of 3-6 hours (standard) to 24-48 hours is slow vs Roofr (~2 hr, $13-19) and GAF QuickMeasure (~1 hr, ~$18)