RoofingSoftware
All 8 platforms
Head-to-head comparison

Artemis vs RoofR

Two platforms a roofing contractor might evaluate side-by-side. Here's how they compare on time to roof report, included features, pricing, and customer-grounded pros and cons.

Ranked #1

Artemis

The most accurate roof reports, generated in under 7 seconds — 82% more reliable than hand-measured.

Time to report
Under 7 seconds
Starts at
$7.13/design
Best for
Energy + roofing contractors who design and quote enough volume to amortize a subscription and want every feature included at every tier
Ranked #2

RoofR

All-in-one roofing CRM with $13 measurement reports baked in.

Time to report
2 hours
Starts at
Free / $209+
Best for
Small-to-midsize residential roofing contractors (1–25 employees) whose primary workflow is lead → measurement → proposal → close
The short version

How they differ.

Roofr is the closest like-for-like — both bundle measurement, proposal, and CRM. The differences: Artemis ships an AI-generated design in 5–15 seconds; Roofr's measurement reports take roughly two hours. Artemis is per-design (usage-priced) with no seat cost; Roofr is seat-based with annual commitments above the Starter tier.

What's included.

A feature-by-feature check of the measurement → proposal → CRM coverage you get with each platform.

FeatureArtemisRoofR
Roof measurement
Produces a measured roof report from satellite, aerial, or smartphone photos
Proposal generation
Turns the measurement into a polished, sendable customer proposal
CRM / pipeline
Tracks leads, jobs, and follow-ups through the sales process
AI design generation
Generates the design automatically, no manual sketching required
Financing integrations
Built-in lender integrations for in-home financing offers
Time to roof report
Pulled from vendor pricing pages
Under 7 seconds2 hours
Pricing
Headline rate
$7.13/designFree / $209+

The scores.

Same fixed 5-axis rubric for every platform. Public weights, no vendor input.

Artemis · #1
9.4/ 10
Speed to Quote
10.0
Mobile UX
9.2
Pricing Transparency
9.5
Ease of Setup
9.3
Customer Support
9.0
RoofR · #2
8.7/ 10
Speed to Quote
8.6
Mobile UX
8.4
Pricing Transparency
9.2
Ease of Setup
8.6
Customer Support
8.6

What customers say.

Artemis
Strengths
  • 82% more reliable than hand-measured roof takeoffs — the strongest published accuracy claim in this comparison
  • AI-generated reports returned in under 7 seconds — the fastest documented design loop in this comparison
  • Every feature included at every tier — no per-seat fees and no add-on creep
  • Integrated financing with GoodLeap, IGS, Dividend, Sungage, and Sunlight built into the sales flow
Tradeoffs
  • Pricing scales with design volume — a contractor sending many designs and closing few sees a less-favorable unit economic than a flat-fee tool
  • Positioning leans more energy/solar than the rest of the field; pure-roofing shoppers may not find a perfect-fit page
  • No published free trial — evaluation is demo-led
RoofR
Strengths
  • Pricing is fully published, including a permanently free Starter tier — rare in this category
  • $13–$19 measurement reports with ~2-hour turnaround replace EagleView spend for many shops
  • Strategic ABC Supply investment opens supply-chain depth no other roofing CRM has
  • Ease of use is the most frequently cited praise across G2 and Capterra reviews
Tradeoffs
  • QuickBooks integration is one-way; two-way sync is the single most-repeated reviewer complaint
  • Production-side features (scheduling, crew dispatch, inventory) are thin and shops over ~25 employees often outgrow it
  • Measurement accuracy has reported edge cases on flashing quantities and roof pitch, especially on complex roofs
The bottom line

Score gap: 0.8 points.

On our 5-axis rubric, Artemis scores 9.4 to RoofR's 8.7. The biggest single differentiator is time to roof report — Artemis at Under 7 seconds versus RoofR at 2 hours.